• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
virology blog

virology blog

About viruses and viral disease

Nobel Prize

Nobel Prize for discovery of hepatitis C virus

8 October 2020 by Vincent Racaniello

The 2020 Nobel Prize in Medicine has been awarded to Harvey Alter, Michael Houghton, and Charles Rice for their work leading to the discovery of hepatitis C virus. To me this prize makes a great deal of sense because each of the recipients produced key sequential discoveries, all of which were needed to find a new viral agent of hepatitis.

Transmissible liver disease has been known for thousands of years. One form was known to be transmitted by feces, and a viral etiology for this disease, subsequently called hepatitis A, was determined after WWII. The agent of a different form of hepatitis transmitted by blood and body fluids was identified in 1967 by Blumberg and colleagues and called hepatitis B virus. Blumberg received the 1976 Medicine Nobel Prize for this discovery.

Harvey Alter was studying hepatitis at the same time as Blumberg and observed that there were cases not caused by either hepatitis A or B virus. He showed that blood from these patients could transmit the disease to chimpanzees. By the mid-1980s studies of infected blood from patients with non-A, non-B (NANB) hepatitis showed the presence of small (less than 80 nm) enveloped particles, suggesting a viral etiology. However, the NANB agent could not be propagated in cell culture.

Identification of the agent of NANB was done by Michael Houghton, working at the Chiron Corporation. He and his colleagues produced a cDNA library from the plasma of an infected chimpanzee. The plasma had been first subjected to high speed centrifugation to enrich for virus particles. The cDNA library was inserted into a phage lambda expression vector designed to produced protein from cloned DNA (pictured; image credit). Plaques were then screened with serum from a chronic NANB patient. The idea was that antibodies to the virus in the serum would react with proteins produced in bacteria from the phage vector. One positive clone, called 5-1-1, was identified out of one million clones that were screened. Sequence analysis of the insert revealed the presence of a (+) strand RNA genome of a novel member of the Flaviviridae. This virus was subsequently named hepatitis C virus. One consequence of this work is that diagnostic reagents were then produced and revealed that many millions of people worldwide were infected with this virus.

Despite having cloned the viral genome, no one was able to recover infectious virus from cells transfected with cloned DNA or RNA transcripts.

Charles Rice and colleagues addressed this problem by producing multiple DNA clones of the viral genome from the serum of a patient with NANB hepatitis. After determining the nucleotide sequence of multiple DNA clones, a consensus genome was constructed that was thought to represent the correct sequence, including the authentic 5’- and 3’-termini. RNA transcripts of each of 10 different clones were inoculated into the liver of two chimpanzees, who subsequently developed hepatitis.

The work of these three groups led to the identification of hepatitis C virus. However, it was not until 2005 that the complete replication of hepatitis C virus was achieved in cells in culture. This work was done by Wakita and colleagues, and represented the last discovery needed to develop antiviral drugs to inhibit reproduction. Today patients treated with a mixture of two or three antiviral drugs can have their hepatitis C cured within months.

Filed Under: Basic virology, Information Tagged With: 5-1-1, hepatitis C virus, infectious viral DNA clone, Nobel Prize, viral, virology, virus, viruses

TWiV 639: Virology Nobel Prizes with Erling Norrby part 2

18 July 2020 by Vincent Racaniello

Vincent and Erling resume their discussion of virology Nobel Prizes, focusing on awards for research on tumor viruses, bacteriophages, virus structure, reverse transcriptase, hepatitis B virus, HIV-1, human papillomaviruses and much more.

Click arrow to play
Download TWiV 639 (65 MB .mp3, 108 min)
Subscribe (free): iTunes, Google Podcasts, RSS, email

Become a patron of TWiV!

Show notes at microbe.tv/twiv

Filed Under: This Week in Virology Tagged With: bacteriophage, DNA structure, hepatitis b virus, HIV-1, human papillomavirus, Nobel Prize, reverse transcriptase, viral, virology, virus, virus structure, viruses

TWiV 514: Staying below the ADAR

7 October 2018 by Vincent Racaniello

The TWiVumvirate reviews this years crop of Nobel Prizes, and how cells prevent leakage of mitochondrial double-stranded RNA into the cytoplasm, which would otherwise lead to the production of interferon.

Click arrow to play
Download TWiV 514 (66 MB .mp3, 108 min)
Subscribe (free): iTunes, Google Podcasts, RSS, email

Become a patron of TWiV!

Show notes at microbe.tv/twiv

Filed Under: This Week in Virology Tagged With: ADAR1, Alu, checkpoint blockade, CTLA-4, degradosome, directed evolution, dsRNA, helicase, IFN, innate immunity, MDA5, mitochiondria, mutagenesis, Nobel Prize, PD-1, phage display, RNA sensor, type 1 interferonopathy, viral, virology, virus, viruses

David Baltimore turns 80

22 March 2018 by Vincent Racaniello

Earlier this month (7 March) David Baltimore, 1975 Nobel Laureate in Physiology or Medicine (and my postdoctoral advisor) turned 80 years old. In celebration I am re-posting two interviews I did with David: one with the TWiV team, and one for Principles of Virology.

If you are in the Los Angeles area, don’t miss David’s 80th Birthday Symposium at CalTech.

*****

Hosts: Vincent Racaniello, Alan Dove, Rich Condit, and David Baltimore

Vincent, Alan, and Rich celebrate the 100th episode of TWiV by talking about viruses with Nobel Laureate David Baltimore.

*****

Filed Under: Information Tagged With: david baltimore, Nobel Prize, reverse transcriptase, viral, virology, virus, viruses

TWiV 463: We haven’t meth but these names ring Nobel

15 October 2017 by Vincent Racaniello

The TWiViridae review the 2017 Nobel Prizes for cryoEM and circadian rhythms, and discuss modulation of plant virus replication by RNA methylation.

Click arrow to play
Download TWiV 463 (63 MB .mp3, 104 min)
Subscribe (free): iTunes, RSS, email

Become a patron of TWiV!

Show notes at microbe.tv/twiv

Filed Under: This Week in Virology Tagged With: alfalfa mosaic virus, Arabidopsis thaliana, circadian rhythm, clock, cryo-electron microscopy, cryoEM, cucumber mosaic virus, N6-methyladenosine, Nobel Prize, RNA methylation, Seymour Benzer, viral, virology, virus, viruses

A Nobel for autophagy, and the importance of fundamental research

6 October 2016 by Vincent Racaniello

autophagyYoshinori Ohsumi has been awarded the 2016 Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine for his work on autophagy, a process of eukaryotic cells for degrading and recycling cellular components. Because of his research, we now understand the importance of autophagy in health and human disease. It is another example of the serendipity of science and yes, it is relevant to virology!

The word autophagy was coined by Christian de Duve in 1963 to describe a process that he and others had previously described: when stressed, cells would sequester portions of the cytoplasm in double-membraned vesicles called autophagosomes. These would then fuse with lysosomes (which de Duve had discovered) and the contents were degraded (illustrated; image credit).

In subsequent years it was suggested that autophagy might have roles in human disease, but little progress was made on understanding how the process worked: how it was triggered, what proteins were involved, and its function in health and pathogenesis.

As a young Assistant Professor at Tokyo University in the early 1990s, Ohsumi found that autophagy occurred in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. He decided to produce yeast strains lacking the proteases that would be involved in digesting the contents of the autophagic vesicles, with the idea that these vesicles would accumulate under stress (under normal conditions the autophagosome exists for a short period of time, making its study difficult).

When Ohsumi stressed the yeasts lacking the vacuolar (equivalent of mammalian lysosome) proteases, autophagosomes accumulated in the cytoplasm which were readily visible by light microscopy. He used this clear phenotype to isolate yeast mutants that could no longer accumulate such vesicles, and identified 15 genes that are essential for induction of autophagy in eukaryotic cells.

Later Ohsumi elucidated the functions of these genes in autophagy induction, and found homologues in mammalian cells. His work stimulated great interest in autophagy, and it became a highly studied pathway. We now understand that autophagy is not only important for embryogenesis and cell differentiation, but plays roles in neurodegenerative diseases, cancer, and in defenses against bacterial and viral infections.

As might be expected, virus infection is a stress that triggers autophagy, which may impact the outcome of infections: it can have both antiviral functions, and it can also stimulate virus replication. As might be expected for a cellular process that degrades cytosolic contents, autophagy can lead to clearance of viruses. Consequently a number of viral genomes encode proteins that inhibit autophagy, including herpes simplex virus. Degradation of viral proteins by autophagy can also provide peptides for presentation to the cellular adaptive immune system, further enhancing clearance.

Autophagy may also benefit virus replication. For example, non-lytic cell to cell spread of poliovirus depends on release of virus particles from autophagosomes, and autophagy of lipids provides metabolic energy for dengue virus replication.

When autophagy was first described in the 1950s, no one knew its significance. Nevertheless, a number of scientists, including Ohsumi, continued to study autophagy because they were curious. The unexpected result was the elucidation of a pathway that has substantial roles in a variety of human diseases.

The lesson is clear: let scientists pursue their curiosity. It’s fine to target specific research problems, like curing cancer or diabetes, but don’t ignore fundamental research on problems that don’t seem to be directly relevant to human diseases. I’m concerned (as are many others) that the US science establishment is moving away from fundamental research (whose benefits may not be apparent for a long time) to translational research.

How do we explain the trend from fundamental to translational research? I don’t have all the answers, but I think part of the problem is that the US Congress likes to spend taxpayer money on targeted problems, like Alzheimer’s disease. But tell them that you want to study a process in cells that looks interesting, but you are not sure what it means, and you can see their reluctance to support this type of work.

Filed Under: Basic virology, Commentary, Information Tagged With: autophagosome, autophagy, Nobel Prize, saccharomyces, serendepity of science, viral, virology, virus, viruses, yeast, Yoshinori Ohsumi

  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

by Vincent Racaniello

Earth’s virology Professor
Questions? virology@virology.ws

With David Tuller and
Gertrud U. Rey

Follow

Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Instagram
Get updates by RSS or Email

Contents

Table of Contents
ME/CFS
Inside a BSL-4
The Wall of Polio
Microbe Art
Interviews With Virologists

Earth’s Virology Course

Virology Live
Columbia U
Virologia en Español
Virology 101
Influenza 101

Podcasts

This Week in Virology
This Week in Microbiology
This Week in Parasitism
This Week in Evolution
Immune
This Week in Neuroscience
All at MicrobeTV

Useful Resources

Lecturio Online Courses
HealthMap
Polio eradication
Promed-Mail
Small Things Considered
ViralZone
Virus Particle Explorer
The Living River
Parasites Without Borders

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.