• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
virology blog

virology blog

About viruses and viral disease

How many viruses are needed to form a plaque?

8 July 2009 by Vincent Racaniello

The plaque assay is an essential tool for determining virus titers. The concept is simple: virus infection is restricted to neighboring cells by a semisolid overlay. By counting the number of plaques, the virus titer can be calculated in PFU per ml. A key question is: how many viruses are needed to form a single plaque?

For most animal viruses, one infectious particle is sufficient to initiate infection. This conclusion can be reached by studying the relationship between the number of infectious virus particles and the plaque count. A linear relationship means that one infectious particle can form a plaque. In this case the virus is said to infect cells with one-hit kinetics. This concept is illustrated below. In this figure, the number of plaques produced by a virus with one-hit kinetics or two-hit kinetics is plotted versus the relative concentration of the virus.

dose-response-plaque-assay

There are some examples of viruses with two-hit kinetics: in other words, two different types of viral particles must infect a cell to initiate the infectious cycle. Examples include the genomes of some (+) strand RNA viruses of plants, which consists of two RNA molecules that are packaged in different particles. The dose-response curve of such viruses is parabolic rather than linear.

When a single virus particle can form a plaque, the viral progeny within the plaque are clones. Virus stocks prepared from a single plaque are called plaque purified virus stocks. To prepare such virus stocks, the tip of a small pipette is inserted into the agar overlay above the plaque. The plug of agar is removed and placed in buffer. The viruses within the agar plug move into the buffer, which can then be used to infect cultured cells. To ensure purity, this process is usually repeated at least one more time. Plaque purification is used extensively in virology to establish clonal virus stocks. The ability to prepare clonal virus stocks was an essential development that permitted genetic analysis of viruses.

Filed Under: Basic virology, Information Tagged With: clonal virus stock, dose response curve, one hit kinetics, pfu, plaque assay, plaque purified, viral, virology, virus

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. David Loria says

    8 July 2009 at 11:29 am

    Could you explain the effect of defective interfering particles and how they affect the final titer of the stocks? and why by using extremely low MOI increase the efficiency?

  2. Thomas Overton says

    12 July 2009 at 4:08 pm

    Dr. Racaniello, I would like to expand on David Loria's question as well as inquire about potential therapeutic uses for defective interfering particles (DIPs) or genetically modified DIPs. If it is the case that the smaller genomes of DIPs are more efficiently replicated than the full length viral genome, then why is the interference not sufficient to eliminate the viral infection? Is this because of a low probability of coinfection between DIPs and viruses with full length genomes? Along those same lines, in the presence of DIPs, why is there a characteristic alternation from high to low infectious titers produced from passage to passage? By the way, thanks for elevating virology’s standing in social media.

  3. profvrr says

    14 July 2009 at 8:27 am

    Defective interfering particles arise when virus infections are
    carried out serially at high multiplicity of infection. They contain
    grossly altered genomes, eg with large deletions, but maintain
    essential functions that allow replicating and packaging of genomes.
    In co-infections with wild type viruses DI particles show a
    replication advantage because they are more efficient at replicating
    their shorter genome, and compete with wild type virus for essential
    replication proteins. Why they arise at high moi infections is not
    known but might be related to their ability to out-compete wild type
    virus when replication factors are limiting, as would be the case when
    many viruses infect a cell.

  4. profvrr says

    14 July 2009 at 8:30 am

    Most DI particles require functions provided in trans by the wild-type
    virus. In the simplest case, DI particles are unable to produce a
    complete viral capsid, and therefore the DI genomes can only be
    packaged when a wild-type virus co-infects the same cell. The
    oscillation in titers occurs because the DI particles reach
    sufficiently high numbers that they interfere substantially with the
    'helper' virus. Since the DI particle needs the helper virus, the
    result is that DI particle titers decline, until helper virus titers
    recover. Hence the oscillating titers of both types of particle.

  5. audreylarrimer says

    22 September 2009 at 11:44 am

    How many virus particles are typically contained in one plaque?

  6. profvrr says

    22 September 2009 at 2:30 pm

    It would depend upon the particular virus, cell, and the size of the
    plaque. From a few thousand to several million.

  7. Ngunjiri_JM says

    5 November 2009 at 7:08 am

    Prof VRR: Do you have any clue as to why DIP are formed in nature?

  8. profvrr says

    5 November 2009 at 3:07 pm

    I have a clue, but I don't know the real reason – neither does anyone else. They form because they outgrow wild type genomes. When a deletion occurs in the viral genome – possibly by polymerase skipping, which happens randomly – those smaller genomes replicate faster than wild type genomes and eventually interfere with replication of wild type virus.

  9. WanYang says

    21 January 2010 at 8:09 am

    Hi, Prof. Racaniello,
    Thanks for these wonderful posts about influenza virus. I'm studying detection of influenza virus by PCR, and confused by the results. According to my qRT-PCR results, 1 PFU of influenza A H3N2 approximately equals to 100,000 genome copies!! (RNA extracted by Trizol-chloroform, RT with random hexamers, PCR targeting a segment of M gene) I tried samples with concentrations ranging from 1-10,000 PFUs, and the results are quite consistent. And some researchers reported a detection limit of 10-4 TCID50. Then if 1 PFU=0.6-0.7 TCID50=1 viral particle, how come this happens? So how many viral particles does a PFU contains exactly? Thanks.

  10. WanYang says

    21 January 2010 at 4:09 pm

    Hi, Prof. Racaniello,
    Thanks for these wonderful posts about influenza virus. I'm studying detection of influenza virus by PCR, and confused by the results. According to my qRT-PCR results, 1 PFU of influenza A H3N2 approximately equals to 100,000 genome copies!! (RNA extracted by Trizol-chloroform, RT with random hexamers, PCR targeting a segment of M gene) I tried samples with concentrations ranging from 1-10,000 PFUs, and the results are quite consistent. And some researchers reported a detection limit of 10-4 TCID50. Then if 1 PFU=0.6-0.7 TCID50=1 viral particle, how come this happens? So how many viral particles does a PFU contains exactly? Thanks.

  11. Shashank says

    10 April 2012 at 7:27 am

    Hi Dr. Racaniello,

    Can you please explain the significance of plaque size against plaque numbers.
     
    Which of these indicates viral pathogenesis and replication rate ?

  12. Fajer Fanahi says

    8 November 2014 at 3:28 pm

    How might PFUs differ from the
    number of viruses?

Primary Sidebar

by Vincent Racaniello

Earth’s virology Professor
Questions? virology@virology.ws

With David Tuller and
Gertrud U. Rey

Follow

Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Instagram
Get updates by RSS or Email

Contents

Table of Contents
ME/CFS
Inside a BSL-4
The Wall of Polio
Microbe Art
Interviews With Virologists

Earth’s Virology Course

Virology Live
Columbia U
Virologia en Español
Virology 101
Influenza 101

Podcasts

This Week in Virology
This Week in Microbiology
This Week in Parasitism
This Week in Evolution
Immune
This Week in Neuroscience
All at MicrobeTV

Useful Resources

Lecturio Online Courses
HealthMap
Polio eradication
Promed-Mail
Small Things Considered
ViralZone
Virus Particle Explorer
The Living River
Parasites Without Borders

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.