Are viruses alive?

The question of whether viruses are living or not always provokes lively discussion. On TWiV 59 we decided to take an informal poll of our listeners on this issue. Let’s open up the poll to readers of virology blog.

This survey had been online since November 2009 and had collected several thousand responses. SurveyMonkey decided to delete all of those, so we are starting over as of January 2013, using a different survey site.

As of November 2013, the second survey site decided to charge users and simply deleted our data without asking. I’m leaving this page up until I find another survey site, mainly because there are quite a few comments below that I don’t want to lose.

In January 2014 I added a new poll. Let’s see how this fares.

Are viruses alive?
Pick one:
  • Biniam

    Funny! Why Philosophise? You are living! So Viruses are! Simple. However, We have to thank God, our creator who really cares for all of us. Because our knowledge about viruses, even ourselves for that matter, is so tiny doesn’t mean that viruses are not helping our planet to servive. Who knows, one day we may lough at our current understanding of viruses and shift our complete paradigm!

  • Sugar Bear

    I wanted to say no because that’s the direction I felt that we were pulled by the text and the class but viruses are allot more than just little puzzles pieces that conveniently fit with living cells to reproduce. Without anthropomorphizing, Viruses reproduce, have a genome, and interact with cells through various complex biochemical processes. Viruses are allot more complicated a lattice of atoms interacting with each other.

  • Pingback: H-huh-N-what? The Bingo Lottery of Flu Viruses | Cracked Science

  • Random D’Foliant

    By managing the boundaries of our definition of ‘life’ or ‘alive’, we manipulate the answer(s).

    The core question to me, an untrained person, is, “Animate or inanimate?” If a virus does something, then that’s an answer. If the virus’ ‘activities’ are merely serendipitous chemical interactions like water contacting sulfur, then that’s an answer.

    I hope to learn enough in this course to join this discussion.

  • JESuS

    Viruses are most certainly living. A virus that does not have living characteristics is classified as a virion, meaning that it does not display characteristics of a living being; it is completely dormant. A virion ≠ a virus. Therefore viruses are living.

    TL;DR
    Viruses = Living
    Virion (a form of virus, but not a virus) = Not living

  • Pingback: TWiV 271: To bee, or not to bee, that is the infection

  • Philippe Le Mercier

    It’s a fascinating question but there is no scientific answer, because it’s more about philosophy and all depends on what is “life”.
    In the past century the definition of life has been reforged hundred times to fit with different belief that people have.
    And like all philosophical debate, everybody can argue for nights without been able to convince each other.

  • http://rybicki.wordpress.com/ Ed Rybicki

    Sounds like you went to my lectures…B-)

  • vmontizzle

    I just think anything that has the capacity to evolve is not dead. This would include satellite RNAs and viroids also.

  • lee

    then we should ask which comes to the world first?virus or cell?

  • Jun

    Viruses can’t do nothing without the host cells, no chemical reaction. But once it interacts with host cells, it infects them by couple of sequences of chemical reaction although it’s passive. I think it’s good to conclude both alive or not.

  • Feel

    Try to think of any other example of something that can go from living, to non-living, to living again. For pretty much any other example they can only go from living to non-living.

    That has some pretty big significance, like finding general relativity doesn’t apply to big and small alike. That is why it is important to classify if it is indeed alive or not, because if it is alive then it would suggest we need to rework our definition of a living specimen.

  • HeyHey

    So the elementary bodies of Chlamydia are not alive? Never mind other bacterial, protozoan and fungal obligate parasites. These, and viruses, adapt and replicate. No, they are not fluffy dogs or organisms that have a consciousness, but they are as alive as you and I, and have a capacity for survival that complex organisms do not have.

  • kapow

    to quote Transformers’ Wheelie: “not quite alive, but, well, also not dead- your life is so confusing, Hardhead!

  • Jim

    Lol so the definition isn’t very helpful:

    1.
    having life; living; existing; not dead or lifeless.
    2.
    living (used for emphasis): the proudest man alive.
    3.
    in a state of action; in force or operation; active: to keep hope alive.
    4.
    full of energy and spirit; lively: Grandmother’s more alive than most of her contemporaries.
    5.
    having the quality of life; vivid; vibrant: The room was alive with color.

  • http://www.celen.info/ Celen

    They are death till they detect an organism with DNA. The interesting thing is that how they can detect them when they are death.

  • Nazario

    That’s only a strategy to survive and reproduce.

  • Nazario

    If their goal is to reproduce themselves or in other words to transmit their genetic material, then they are alive.

  • Jimbo

    “It’s life Jim, but not as we know!”