<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Novartis influenza A H1N1 vaccine clinical data</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.virology.ws/2009/11/18/novartis-influenza-a-h1n1-vaccine-clinical-dat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/11/18/novartis-influenza-a-h1n1-vaccine-clinical-dat/</link>
	<description>About viruses and viral disease</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 16:57:56 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kikan</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/11/18/novartis-influenza-a-h1n1-vaccine-clinical-dat/comment-page-1/#comment-18911</link>
		<dc:creator>kikan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=2335#comment-18911</guid>
		<description>hi, the side effect which happened recently is not those small swelling at the injection side, but is the swelling of tongue, and the swelling of the whole leg. These seems to be quite serious to me. May I know is this kind of swelling consider as dangerous?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What is the different in the H1N1 vaccine produce by Novartis and GSK or other company? How do we know which Vaccine is safer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi, the side effect which happened recently is not those small swelling at the injection side, but is the swelling of tongue, and the swelling of the whole leg. These seems to be quite serious to me. May I know is this kind of swelling consider as dangerous?</p>
<p>What is the different in the H1N1 vaccine produce by Novartis and GSK or other company? How do we know which Vaccine is safer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Novartis influenza A H1N1 vaccine clinical data &#124; H3N2FLU.US</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/11/18/novartis-influenza-a-h1n1-vaccine-clinical-dat/comment-page-1/#comment-18904</link>
		<dc:creator>Novartis influenza A H1N1 vaccine clinical data &#124; H3N2FLU.US</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=2335#comment-18904</guid>
		<description>[...] It is made in the same way as the 2009 H1N1 vaccine; the &#8230;     Originally posted here: Novartis influenza A H1N1 vaccine clinical data   Posted in H3N2 Influenza Information. Tags: same, seasonal, the, the-2009, the-same, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It is made in the same way as the 2009 H1N1 vaccine; the &#8230;     Originally posted here: Novartis influenza A H1N1 vaccine clinical data   Posted in H3N2 Influenza Information. Tags: same, seasonal, the, the-2009, the-same, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: profvrr</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/11/18/novartis-influenza-a-h1n1-vaccine-clinical-dat/comment-page-1/#comment-18876</link>
		<dc:creator>profvrr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=2335#comment-18876</guid>
		<description>The &#039;normal&#039; influenza vaccine, or the seasonal vaccine, consists of&lt;br&gt;three different viruses: seasonal H1N1 and H3N2, and an influenza B&lt;br&gt;virus strain. It is made in the same way as the 2009 H1N1 vaccine; the&lt;br&gt;only difference is that vaccine contains only one virus, the pandemic&lt;br&gt;H1N1 strain. Side effects such as swelling at the injection site,&lt;br&gt;fever, and rashes were reported in the clinical trial and are not&lt;br&gt;unexpected when the vaccine is used in the general population.&lt;br&gt;Clinical trials cannot prove that a vaccine is 100% safe; but they can&lt;br&gt;provide information on commonly occurring side effects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#39;normal&#39; influenza vaccine, or the seasonal vaccine, consists of<br />three different viruses: seasonal H1N1 and H3N2, and an influenza B<br />virus strain. It is made in the same way as the 2009 H1N1 vaccine; the<br />only difference is that vaccine contains only one virus, the pandemic<br />H1N1 strain. Side effects such as swelling at the injection site,<br />fever, and rashes were reported in the clinical trial and are not<br />unexpected when the vaccine is used in the general population.<br />Clinical trials cannot prove that a vaccine is 100% safe; but they can<br />provide information on commonly occurring side effects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kikan</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/11/18/novartis-influenza-a-h1n1-vaccine-clinical-dat/comment-page-1/#comment-18859</link>
		<dc:creator>kikan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=2335#comment-18859</guid>
		<description>hi, &lt;br&gt;there are news about H1N1 vaccine getting side effects like swelling, rashes and fever happening recently. So how do these clinical trial prove to us that they are really safe?&lt;br&gt;What is the different between  (Influza A) H1N1 vaccine and the normal influza vaccine?&lt;br&gt;Please advise. Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi, <br />there are news about H1N1 vaccine getting side effects like swelling, rashes and fever happening recently. So how do these clinical trial prove to us that they are really safe?<br />What is the different between  (Influza A) H1N1 vaccine and the normal influza vaccine?<br />Please advise. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: profvrr</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/11/18/novartis-influenza-a-h1n1-vaccine-clinical-dat/comment-page-1/#comment-18677</link>
		<dc:creator>profvrr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=2335#comment-18677</guid>
		<description>According to the Novartis results, one shot of a half-dose provides&lt;br&gt;protective immunity. So the kids should be protected after one dose if&lt;br&gt;they received the Novartis vaccine. The vaccines of the other&lt;br&gt;manufacturers haven&#039;t been tested at half dose, so we don&#039;t know if&lt;br&gt;they would be fully protective. But I think some protection would be&lt;br&gt;conferred, at least to make the disease milder if acquired.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the Novartis results, one shot of a half-dose provides<br />protective immunity. So the kids should be protected after one dose if<br />they received the Novartis vaccine. The vaccines of the other<br />manufacturers haven&#39;t been tested at half dose, so we don&#39;t know if<br />they would be fully protective. But I think some protection would be<br />conferred, at least to make the disease milder if acquired.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Novartis influenza A H1N1 vaccine clinical data -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/11/18/novartis-influenza-a-h1n1-vaccine-clinical-dat/comment-page-1/#comment-18668</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Novartis influenza A H1N1 vaccine clinical data -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=2335#comment-18668</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Vincent Racaniello, Daniel Ferreira. Daniel Ferreira said: Novartis influenza A #H1N1 vaccine clinical data http://bit.ly/2CeEnX at virology blog #swineflu [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Vincent Racaniello, Daniel Ferreira. Daniel Ferreira said: Novartis influenza A #H1N1 vaccine clinical data <a href="http://bit.ly/2CeEnX" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/2CeEnX</a> at virology blog #swineflu [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trinetsouderos</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/11/18/novartis-influenza-a-h1n1-vaccine-clinical-dat/comment-page-1/#comment-18671</link>
		<dc:creator>trinetsouderos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=2335#comment-18671</guid>
		<description>I think a lot of parents who had a hard time getting their kids the first dose may find it difficult to get their kids the booster four weeks later. For many kids, it will be many weeks after that. How protected are the kids until they get that second immunization?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a lot of parents who had a hard time getting their kids the first dose may find it difficult to get their kids the booster four weeks later. For many kids, it will be many weeks after that. How protected are the kids until they get that second immunization?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: profvrr</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/11/18/novartis-influenza-a-h1n1-vaccine-clinical-dat/comment-page-1/#comment-18670</link>
		<dc:creator>profvrr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=2335#comment-18670</guid>
		<description>Hi Trine,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Immune responses peak in ~3 weeks, therefore 4 weeks is used just to be safe. See figure in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.virology.ws/2009/07/22/adaptive-immune-defenses-antibodies/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.virology.ws/2009/07/22/adaptive-immu...&lt;/a&gt;. You want to wait for the primary response to be over before boosting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Trine,</p>
<p>Immune responses peak in ~3 weeks, therefore 4 weeks is used just to be safe. See figure in <a href="http://www.virology.ws/2009/07/22/adaptive-immune-defenses-antibodies/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.virology.ws/2009/07/22/adaptive-immu.." rel="nofollow">http://www.virology.ws/2009/07/22/adaptive-immu..</a>.. You want to wait for the primary response to be over before boosting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trinetsouderos</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/11/18/novartis-influenza-a-h1n1-vaccine-clinical-dat/comment-page-1/#comment-18669</link>
		<dc:creator>trinetsouderos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=2335#comment-18669</guid>
		<description>Hi Vincent,&lt;br&gt;Quick question: Why four weeks apart? Is there some special reason for this, and what if it is five weeks apart, or more, or less? How do they determine the spacing? Thanks, T</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Vincent,<br />Quick question: Why four weeks apart? Is there some special reason for this, and what if it is five weeks apart, or more, or less? How do they determine the spacing? Thanks, T</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
