<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Being older is a good defense against 2009 H1N1 influenza virus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.virology.ws/2009/11/02/why-being-older-is-a-good-defense-against-2009-h1n1-influenza-virus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/11/02/why-being-older-is-a-good-defense-against-2009-h1n1-influenza-virus/</link>
	<description>About viruses and viral disease</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Protection against 2009 influenza H1N1 by immunization with 1918-like and classical swine viruses</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/11/02/why-being-older-is-a-good-defense-against-2009-h1n1-influenza-virus/comment-page-1/#comment-20361</link>
		<dc:creator>Protection against 2009 influenza H1N1 by immunization with 1918-like and classical swine viruses</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=2260#comment-20361</guid>
		<description>[...] infects individuals under 35 years of age. We&#8217;ve previously noted that being older is a good defense against 2009 H1N1 influenza virus, in part because older people have antibodies that block [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] infects individuals under 35 years of age. We&#8217;ve previously noted that being older is a good defense against 2009 H1N1 influenza virus, in part because older people have antibodies that block [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrianHanley</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/11/02/why-being-older-is-a-good-defense-against-2009-h1n1-influenza-virus/comment-page-1/#comment-21617</link>
		<dc:creator>BrianHanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=2260#comment-21617</guid>
		<description>I wish I could find actual titer and CD8 activation data on various vaccines such as Flumist vs injected to compare. I&#039;m probably just not searching properly for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish I could find actual titer and CD8 activation data on various vaccines such as Flumist vs injected to compare. I&#39;m probably just not searching properly for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrianHanley</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/11/02/why-being-older-is-a-good-defense-against-2009-h1n1-influenza-virus/comment-page-1/#comment-21619</link>
		<dc:creator>BrianHanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=2260#comment-21619</guid>
		<description>Yes, Webster et al say in their review that, &quot;The influenza viruses currently circulating in humans and pigs in North America originated by transmission of all genes from the avian reservoir prior to the 1918 Spanish influenza pandemic.&quot; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://mmbr.asm.org/cgi/content/abstract/56/1/152&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://mmbr.asm.org/cgi/content/abstract/56/1/152&lt;/a&gt; ) But that is different from saying that 1918 was the first time influenza existed in pigs, and they make clear that inferring dates from phylogeny interpreted sequencing is dicey. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Evolutionary theory would not favor the view that swine adapted influenza never existed before then or first reassorted in 1918.  This is supported by the observation that influenza B and C viruses do not occur in birds and C viruses are isolated from pigs and dogs, which indicates that these diverged a very long time ago from the primary avian strains. (See: pg 166 on origins.)  That indicates that multiple &quot;cycles&quot; of crossover from avians into mammals have occurred in the past, with the crossover viruses adapting to their hosts. It is doubtless the case that most of those crossovers went extinct, thus B and C strains of humans are relics of past events. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So I don&#039;t think anyone can say for absolute certain one way or another, only infer from phylogenetic evidence, and negative phylogenetic evidence is weak with influenza because of the high probability that lineages can die out, particularly when there were fewer people and pigs and those populations had poorer interaction networks. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My view is that water birds and other fowl have been infecting pigs with influenza for thousands of years in human communities. The fact that water where waterbirds live can be laden with influenza viruses and that those viruses can remain infectious for long periods in water, dependent on salts, pH and temperature, strongly indicates that the conditions have existed for influenza transmission to pigs anywhere that pigs were kept as livestock in human history. (I believe not keeping pigs as livestock has bearing on the immunological evolution of Native Americans relative to influenza.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Webster et al say in their review that, &#8220;The influenza viruses currently circulating in humans and pigs in North America originated by transmission of all genes from the avian reservoir prior to the 1918 Spanish influenza pandemic.&#8221; (<a href="http://mmbr.asm.org/cgi/content/abstract/56/1/152" rel="nofollow">http://mmbr.asm.org/cgi/content/abstract/56/1/152</a> ) But that is different from saying that 1918 was the first time influenza existed in pigs, and they make clear that inferring dates from phylogeny interpreted sequencing is dicey. </p>
<p>Evolutionary theory would not favor the view that swine adapted influenza never existed before then or first reassorted in 1918.  This is supported by the observation that influenza B and C viruses do not occur in birds and C viruses are isolated from pigs and dogs, which indicates that these diverged a very long time ago from the primary avian strains. (See: pg 166 on origins.)  That indicates that multiple &#8220;cycles&#8221; of crossover from avians into mammals have occurred in the past, with the crossover viruses adapting to their hosts. It is doubtless the case that most of those crossovers went extinct, thus B and C strains of humans are relics of past events. </p>
<p>So I don&#39;t think anyone can say for absolute certain one way or another, only infer from phylogenetic evidence, and negative phylogenetic evidence is weak with influenza because of the high probability that lineages can die out, particularly when there were fewer people and pigs and those populations had poorer interaction networks. </p>
<p>My view is that water birds and other fowl have been infecting pigs with influenza for thousands of years in human communities. The fact that water where waterbirds live can be laden with influenza viruses and that those viruses can remain infectious for long periods in water, dependent on salts, pH and temperature, strongly indicates that the conditions have existed for influenza transmission to pigs anywhere that pigs were kept as livestock in human history. (I believe not keeping pigs as livestock has bearing on the immunological evolution of Native Americans relative to influenza.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: profvrr</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/11/02/why-being-older-is-a-good-defense-against-2009-h1n1-influenza-virus/comment-page-1/#comment-21618</link>
		<dc:creator>profvrr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 00:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=2260#comment-21618</guid>
		<description>Thanks for that letter. Interesting that pigs are discussed as&lt;br&gt;possible vectors for influenza. It is my understanding that influenza&lt;br&gt;went into pigs for the first time in 1918, and wasn&#039;t known before&lt;br&gt;that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that letter. Interesting that pigs are discussed as<br />possible vectors for influenza. It is my understanding that influenza<br />went into pigs for the first time in 1918, and wasn&#39;t known before<br />that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrianHanley</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/11/02/why-being-older-is-a-good-defense-against-2009-h1n1-influenza-virus/comment-page-1/#comment-18884</link>
		<dc:creator>BrianHanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=2260#comment-18884</guid>
		<description>I wish I could find actual titer and CD8 activation data on various vaccines such as Flumist vs injected to compare. I&#039;m probably just not searching properly for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish I could find actual titer and CD8 activation data on various vaccines such as Flumist vs injected to compare. I&#39;m probably just not searching properly for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrianHanley</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/11/02/why-being-older-is-a-good-defense-against-2009-h1n1-influenza-virus/comment-page-1/#comment-18883</link>
		<dc:creator>BrianHanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=2260#comment-18883</guid>
		<description>Yes, Webster et al say in their review that, &quot;The influenza viruses currently circulating in humans and pigs in North America originated by transmission of all genes from the avian reservoir prior to the 1918 Spanish influenza pandemic.&quot; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://mmbr.asm.org/cgi/content/abstract/56/1/152&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://mmbr.asm.org/cgi/content/abstract/56/1/152&lt;/a&gt; ) But that is different from saying that 1918 was the first time influenza existed in pigs, and they make clear that inferring dates from phylogeny interpreted sequencing is dicey. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Evolutionary theory would not favor the view that swine adapted influenza never existed before then or first reassorted in 1918.  This is supported by the observation that influenza B and C viruses do not occur in birds and C viruses are isolated from pigs and dogs, which indicates that these diverged a very long time ago from the primary avian strains. (See: pg 166 on origins.)  That indicates that multiple &quot;cycles&quot; of crossover from avians into mammals have occurred in the past, with the crossover viruses adapting to their hosts. It is doubtless the case that most of those crossovers went extinct, thus B and C strains of humans are relics of past events. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So I don&#039;t think anyone can say for absolute certain one way or another, only infer from phylogenetic evidence, and negative phylogenetic evidence is weak with influenza because of the high probability that lineages can die out, particularly when there were fewer people and pigs and those populations had poorer interaction networks. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My view is that water birds and other fowl have been infecting pigs with influenza for thousands of years in human communities. The fact that water where waterbirds live can be laden with influenza viruses and that those viruses can remain infectious for long periods in water, dependent on salts, pH and temperature, strongly indicates that the conditions have existed for influenza transmission to pigs anywhere that pigs were kept as livestock in human history. (I believe not keeping pigs as livestock has bearing on the immunological evolution of Native Americans relative to influenza.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Webster et al say in their review that, &#8220;The influenza viruses currently circulating in humans and pigs in North America originated by transmission of all genes from the avian reservoir prior to the 1918 Spanish influenza pandemic.&#8221; (<a href="http://mmbr.asm.org/cgi/content/abstract/56/1/152" rel="nofollow">http://mmbr.asm.org/cgi/content/abstract/56/1/152</a> ) But that is different from saying that 1918 was the first time influenza existed in pigs, and they make clear that inferring dates from phylogeny interpreted sequencing is dicey. </p>
<p>Evolutionary theory would not favor the view that swine adapted influenza never existed before then or first reassorted in 1918.  This is supported by the observation that influenza B and C viruses do not occur in birds and C viruses are isolated from pigs and dogs, which indicates that these diverged a very long time ago from the primary avian strains. (See: pg 166 on origins.)  That indicates that multiple &#8220;cycles&#8221; of crossover from avians into mammals have occurred in the past, with the crossover viruses adapting to their hosts. It is doubtless the case that most of those crossovers went extinct, thus B and C strains of humans are relics of past events. </p>
<p>So I don&#39;t think anyone can say for absolute certain one way or another, only infer from phylogenetic evidence, and negative phylogenetic evidence is weak with influenza because of the high probability that lineages can die out, particularly when there were fewer people and pigs and those populations had poorer interaction networks. </p>
<p>My view is that water birds and other fowl have been infecting pigs with influenza for thousands of years in human communities. The fact that water where waterbirds live can be laden with influenza viruses and that those viruses can remain infectious for long periods in water, dependent on salts, pH and temperature, strongly indicates that the conditions have existed for influenza transmission to pigs anywhere that pigs were kept as livestock in human history. (I believe not keeping pigs as livestock has bearing on the immunological evolution of Native Americans relative to influenza.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: profvrr</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/11/02/why-being-older-is-a-good-defense-against-2009-h1n1-influenza-virus/comment-page-1/#comment-18872</link>
		<dc:creator>profvrr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=2260#comment-18872</guid>
		<description>Thanks for that letter. Interesting that pigs are discussed as&lt;br&gt;possible vectors for influenza. It is my understanding that influenza&lt;br&gt;went into pigs for the first time in 1918, and wasn&#039;t known before&lt;br&gt;that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that letter. Interesting that pigs are discussed as<br />possible vectors for influenza. It is my understanding that influenza<br />went into pigs for the first time in 1918, and wasn&#39;t known before<br />that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrianHanley</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/11/02/why-being-older-is-a-good-defense-against-2009-h1n1-influenza-virus/comment-page-1/#comment-18808</link>
		<dc:creator>BrianHanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=2260#comment-18808</guid>
		<description>FWIW - Nature 326, 449-450 (8 April 1987) &#124; doi:10.1038/326449c0 &quot;Cause of death of the American Indians&quot; discusses possible swine flu origin influenza epidemic in 1493. &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v326/n6112/pdf/326449c0.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v326/n6112...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FWIW &#8211; Nature 326, 449-450 (8 April 1987) | doi:10.1038/326449c0 &#8220;Cause of death of the American Indians&#8221; discusses possible swine flu origin influenza epidemic in 1493. <br /><a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v326/n6112/pdf/326449c0.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v326/n6112&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is yearly influenza vaccination of children a bad idea?</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/11/02/why-being-older-is-a-good-defense-against-2009-h1n1-influenza-virus/comment-page-1/#comment-18342</link>
		<dc:creator>Is yearly influenza vaccination of children a bad idea?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 13:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=2260#comment-18342</guid>
		<description>[...] you have read “Being older is a good defense against 2009 H1N1 influenza”, you are familiar with the concept of ‘heterosubtypic immunity’. After natural infection [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you have read “Being older is a good defense against 2009 H1N1 influenza”, you are familiar with the concept of ‘heterosubtypic immunity’. After natural infection [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: profvrr</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/11/02/why-being-older-is-a-good-defense-against-2009-h1n1-influenza-virus/comment-page-1/#comment-18306</link>
		<dc:creator>profvrr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 23:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=2260#comment-18306</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s very possible. There haven&#039;t been sufficient studies to know if homotypic immunity conferred by vaccines predisposes to more severe pandemic disease. Check back Friday for a post on this issue stimulated by a recent Lancet article. I&#039;m sure it will be investigated further; although the results are from animals they are compelling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s very possible. There haven&#39;t been sufficient studies to know if homotypic immunity conferred by vaccines predisposes to more severe pandemic disease. Check back Friday for a post on this issue stimulated by a recent Lancet article. I&#39;m sure it will be investigated further; although the results are from animals they are compelling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: profvrr</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/11/02/why-being-older-is-a-good-defense-against-2009-h1n1-influenza-virus/comment-page-1/#comment-18305</link>
		<dc:creator>profvrr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 23:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=2260#comment-18305</guid>
		<description>Influenza virus-specific CD8 T cells do not prevent infection but are important for recovery from infection. The epitopes are known and are conserved, hence are cross-protective. See Immunology and Cell Biology (2009) 87, 300–308 for a good recent review. These cells might control disease severity in different hosts. Yes, Th1 cells would be important a they drive proliferation of CD8 T cells. I think Flumist would basically mimic a natural infection and hence there won&#039;t be issues with too rapid clearance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Influenza virus-specific CD8 T cells do not prevent infection but are important for recovery from infection. The epitopes are known and are conserved, hence are cross-protective. See Immunology and Cell Biology (2009) 87, 300–308 for a good recent review. These cells might control disease severity in different hosts. Yes, Th1 cells would be important a they drive proliferation of CD8 T cells. I think Flumist would basically mimic a natural infection and hence there won&#39;t be issues with too rapid clearance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: profvrr</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/11/02/why-being-older-is-a-good-defense-against-2009-h1n1-influenza-virus/comment-page-1/#comment-18304</link>
		<dc:creator>profvrr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 23:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=2260#comment-18304</guid>
		<description>The patent applications discussed in the links you sent relate to producing swine influenza viruses with an alteration in the protein NS1. This was being done to produce an attenuated vaccine. The patent application was submitted around 2004. To believe that this means the current swine flu is &#039;engineered&#039; in a laboratory is incorrect. Swine influenza viruses have been in pigs since 1918 and there are many of them. The swine virus used in this patent application is very different from the 2009 H1N1 swine-origin influenza virus. I&#039;m frustrated at the rampant misunderstanding; apparently not everyone reads this blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The patent applications discussed in the links you sent relate to producing swine influenza viruses with an alteration in the protein NS1. This was being done to produce an attenuated vaccine. The patent application was submitted around 2004. To believe that this means the current swine flu is &#39;engineered&#39; in a laboratory is incorrect. Swine influenza viruses have been in pigs since 1918 and there are many of them. The swine virus used in this patent application is very different from the 2009 H1N1 swine-origin influenza virus. I&#39;m frustrated at the rampant misunderstanding; apparently not everyone reads this blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: profvrr</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/11/02/why-being-older-is-a-good-defense-against-2009-h1n1-influenza-virus/comment-page-1/#comment-18303</link>
		<dc:creator>profvrr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 23:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=2260#comment-18303</guid>
		<description>There is no reason why you can&#039;t have either influenza vaccine while breastfeeding. The infectious vaccine (Flumist) should not be given during pregnancy; but post-partum administration is fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no reason why you can&#39;t have either influenza vaccine while breastfeeding. The infectious vaccine (Flumist) should not be given during pregnancy; but post-partum administration is fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G. Curzon</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/11/02/why-being-older-is-a-good-defense-against-2009-h1n1-influenza-virus/comment-page-1/#comment-18302</link>
		<dc:creator>G. Curzon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=2260#comment-18302</guid>
		<description>Given that heterosubtypic immunity is not triggered with regular seasonal flu shots, could it be that patients who succumb to severe and fatal Novel A/H1N1 2009 infection have received regular seasonal flu shots over the past few years? I wonder if it is the common denominator for patients in the 31-64 age-range some of whom have had known health risks and others who have not. Certainly patients with known health risks such as asthma or diabetes would be more likely to have received seasonal flu shots annually. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://public-healthcare-issues.suite101.com/article.cfm/swine_flu_shot_vs_longterm_risk_study_for_kids&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://public-healthcare-issues.suite101.com/ar...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Then there&#039;s the 10 year study of children with asthma (link above) that showed increased hospitalizations for ILI with asthmatic children who had received seasonal flu shots vs. those who had not. Could development of heterosubtypic immunity be relevant in these cases as well?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Wonder if this will be investigated further...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given that heterosubtypic immunity is not triggered with regular seasonal flu shots, could it be that patients who succumb to severe and fatal Novel A/H1N1 2009 infection have received regular seasonal flu shots over the past few years? I wonder if it is the common denominator for patients in the 31-64 age-range some of whom have had known health risks and others who have not. Certainly patients with known health risks such as asthma or diabetes would be more likely to have received seasonal flu shots annually. </p>
<p><a href="http://public-healthcare-issues.suite101.com/article.cfm/swine_flu_shot_vs_longterm_risk_study_for_kids" rel="nofollow">http://public-healthcare-issues.suite101.com/ar&#8230;</a></p>
<p>Then there&#39;s the 10 year study of children with asthma (link above) that showed increased hospitalizations for ILI with asthmatic children who had received seasonal flu shots vs. those who had not. Could development of heterosubtypic immunity be relevant in these cases as well?</p>
<p>Wonder if this will be investigated further&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Kelsey</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/11/02/why-being-older-is-a-good-defense-against-2009-h1n1-influenza-virus/comment-page-1/#comment-18277</link>
		<dc:creator>John Kelsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=2260#comment-18277</guid>
		<description>Is it known how important T-cell vs antibody response is against influenza?  If the H and N molecules change a lot faster than the rest of the virus, it seems like the virus might often mutate so that your neutralizing antibodies don&#039;t work, but you could still get over the flu faster because of the CTL response.  (Would Th1 response also be important here?)  Is this likely an explanation for how some people seem to carry the flu without getting very sick?  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m curious how this might interact with getting the Flumist instead of the inactivated vaccine.  On one hand, my CTLs might suppress the infection too fast because it recognizes the similar protein fragments from previous infections.  On the other hand, the live virus can give me an effective CTL response for the next time I&#039;m exposed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it known how important T-cell vs antibody response is against influenza?  If the H and N molecules change a lot faster than the rest of the virus, it seems like the virus might often mutate so that your neutralizing antibodies don&#39;t work, but you could still get over the flu faster because of the CTL response.  (Would Th1 response also be important here?)  Is this likely an explanation for how some people seem to carry the flu without getting very sick?  </p>
<p>I&#39;m curious how this might interact with getting the Flumist instead of the inactivated vaccine.  On one hand, my CTLs might suppress the infection too fast because it recognizes the similar protein fragments from previous infections.  On the other hand, the live virus can give me an effective CTL response for the next time I&#39;m exposed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SergyOrloff</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/11/02/why-being-older-is-a-good-defense-against-2009-h1n1-influenza-virus/comment-page-1/#comment-18271</link>
		<dc:creator>SergyOrloff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 08:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=2260#comment-18271</guid>
		<description>Can you comment this information? - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread515458/pg1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread51545...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.freepatentsonline.com/y2009/0010962.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.freepatentsonline.com/y2009/0010962....&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KmhREAMmfhg&amp;hd=1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KmhREAMmfhg&amp;hd=1&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you comment this information? &#8211; <a href="http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread515458/pg1" rel="nofollow">http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread51545&#8230;</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.freepatentsonline.com/y2009/0010962.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.freepatentsonline.com/y2009/0010962&#8230;.</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KmhREAMmfhg&#038;hd=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KmhREAMmfhg&#038;hd=1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/11/02/why-being-older-is-a-good-defense-against-2009-h1n1-influenza-virus/comment-page-1/#comment-18265</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 01:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=2260#comment-18265</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by profvrr: Being older is a good defense against 2009 H1N1 influenza virus http://bit.ly/45JNqH at virology blog #h1n1 #swineflu...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by profvrr: Being older is a good defense against 2009 H1N1 influenza virus <a href="http://bit.ly/45JNqH" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/45JNqH</a> at virology blog #h1n1 #swineflu&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Being older is a good defense against 2009 H1N1 influenza virus -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/11/02/why-being-older-is-a-good-defense-against-2009-h1n1-influenza-virus/comment-page-1/#comment-18253</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Being older is a good defense against 2009 H1N1 influenza virus -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 23:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=2260#comment-18253</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Vincent Racaniello, Krista and Chris Upton, Chris Upton. Chris Upton said: RT @profvrr: Being older is a good defense against 2009 H1N1 influenza virus http://bit.ly/45JNqH at virology blog #h1n1 #swineflu [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Vincent Racaniello, Krista and Chris Upton, Chris Upton. Chris Upton said: RT @profvrr: Being older is a good defense against 2009 H1N1 influenza virus <a href="http://bit.ly/45JNqH" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/45JNqH</a> at virology blog #h1n1 #swineflu [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erica</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/11/02/why-being-older-is-a-good-defense-against-2009-h1n1-influenza-virus/comment-page-1/#comment-18262</link>
		<dc:creator>Erica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=2260#comment-18262</guid>
		<description>As suspected, only the live virus nasal spray is available for h1n1 in my area. They turned me away b/c I was breastfeeding and said I could not have it. My ob said he&#039;d prefer the injection but either one is okay, my child&#039;s doctor said wait for the shot, the CDC and WHO say breastfeeding is NOT contraindicated for the nasal spray. I&#039;m confused, why is it not okay for nursing mothers? Can anyone help me please? Odds are I will be bringing this crap home before we can get a shot. It just seemed more like risking my son&#039;s life by not getting the vaccine and having it deliver the antibodies into my milk than by getting the cooked version. Can you please help me with this, as I can not decide what to do. Thank you-Erica</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As suspected, only the live virus nasal spray is available for h1n1 in my area. They turned me away b/c I was breastfeeding and said I could not have it. My ob said he&#39;d prefer the injection but either one is okay, my child&#39;s doctor said wait for the shot, the CDC and WHO say breastfeeding is NOT contraindicated for the nasal spray. I&#39;m confused, why is it not okay for nursing mothers? Can anyone help me please? Odds are I will be bringing this crap home before we can get a shot. It just seemed more like risking my son&#39;s life by not getting the vaccine and having it deliver the antibodies into my milk than by getting the cooked version. Can you please help me with this, as I can not decide what to do. Thank you-Erica</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

