Comments on: How viruses are classified http://www.virology.ws/2009/08/07/how-viruses-are-classified/ About viruses and viral disease Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:38:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Penegra http://www.virology.ws/2009/08/07/how-viruses-are-classified/comment-page-1/#comment-30562 Penegra Tue, 03 Jan 2012 10:15:00 +0000 http://www.virology.ws/?p=1884#comment-30562 Great loved it, will be waiting for your future posts Thank you for sharing Great loved it, will be waiting for your future posts Thank
you for sharing

]]> By: reverse phone lookup http://www.virology.ws/2009/08/07/how-viruses-are-classified/comment-page-1/#comment-29877 reverse phone lookup Thu, 17 Nov 2011 21:06:00 +0000 http://www.virology.ws/?p=1884#comment-29877 nice theme. but it takes a while to load nice theme. but it takes a while to load

]]> By: Generic Cialis http://www.virology.ws/2009/08/07/how-viruses-are-classified/comment-page-1/#comment-28049 Generic Cialis Fri, 08 Jul 2011 07:52:00 +0000 http://www.virology.ws/?p=1884#comment-28049 I think there are many types of virus affecting human health, it's hard to define all over I think there are many types of virus affecting human health, it’s hard to define all over

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.virology.ws/2009/08/07/how-viruses-are-classified/comment-page-1/#comment-27629 Anonymous Fri, 03 Jun 2011 14:50:00 +0000 http://www.virology.ws/?p=1884#comment-27629 I agree with your points:),Thanks for your information:) I agree with your points:),Thanks for your information:)

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.virology.ws/2009/08/07/how-viruses-are-classified/comment-page-1/#comment-27529 Anonymous Tue, 31 May 2011 16:26:00 +0000 http://www.virology.ws/?p=1884#comment-27529 Computer viruses can be classified by many methods. Computer viruses can be classified by many methods.

]]> By: Classified http://www.virology.ws/2009/08/07/how-viruses-are-classified/comment-page-1/#comment-25054 Classified Tue, 18 Jan 2011 15:42:00 +0000 http://www.virology.ws/?p=1884#comment-25054 Promoting your business targeting the US population can give you faster profit. Cities like Los Angeles, Chicago and other power hubs should be your focus as these cities can help in shooting up your business or service at a faster pace. Considering the US market one of the best ways to get your traffic going is to place your ad on the online classifieds websites. These classifieds sites have become very popular among the common public and provide users with a never before experienced browsing and posting experience. Promoting your business targeting the US population can give you faster profit. Cities like Los Angeles, Chicago and other power hubs should be your focus as these cities can help in shooting up your business or service at a faster pace. Considering the US market one of the best ways to get your traffic going is to place your ad on the online classifieds websites. These classifieds sites have become very popular among the common public and provide users with a never before experienced browsing and posting experience.

]]> By: profvrr http://www.virology.ws/2009/08/07/how-viruses-are-classified/comment-page-1/#comment-21603 profvrr Mon, 07 Dec 2009 23:03:22 +0000 http://www.virology.ws/?p=1884#comment-21603 HCV specific inhibitors against the NS3/4A polymerase and the NS5B<br>polymerase are currently in clinical trials and look promising.<br>Several new protease inhibitors, nucleoside and non-nucleoside<br>polymerase inhibitors and compounds with anti-HCV activity such as<br>cyclophilin inhibitors, silibinin, and nitazoxanide are currently in<br>clinical evaluation. HCV specific inhibitors against the NS3/4A polymerase and the NS5B
polymerase are currently in clinical trials and look promising.
Several new protease inhibitors, nucleoside and non-nucleoside
polymerase inhibitors and compounds with anti-HCV activity such as
cyclophilin inhibitors, silibinin, and nitazoxanide are currently in
clinical evaluation.

]]> By: profvrr http://www.virology.ws/2009/08/07/how-viruses-are-classified/comment-page-1/#comment-19155 profvrr Mon, 07 Dec 2009 15:03:22 +0000 http://www.virology.ws/?p=1884#comment-19155 HCV specific inhibitors against the NS3/4A polymerase and the NS5B<br>polymerase are currently in clinical trials and look promising.<br>Several new protease inhibitors, nucleoside and non-nucleoside<br>polymerase inhibitors and compounds with anti-HCV activity such as<br>cyclophilin inhibitors, silibinin, and nitazoxanide are currently in<br>clinical evaluation. HCV specific inhibitors against the NS3/4A polymerase and the NS5B
polymerase are currently in clinical trials and look promising.
Several new protease inhibitors, nucleoside and non-nucleoside
polymerase inhibitors and compounds with anti-HCV activity such as
cyclophilin inhibitors, silibinin, and nitazoxanide are currently in
clinical evaluation.

]]> By: ROBERT VALDEZ http://www.virology.ws/2009/08/07/how-viruses-are-classified/comment-page-1/#comment-19141 ROBERT VALDEZ Mon, 07 Dec 2009 00:17:23 +0000 http://www.virology.ws/?p=1884#comment-19141 ANY COMMMENT ON HEPITITIS C VIRUS ANY NEW CURES ANY COMMMENT ON HEPITITIS C VIRUS ANY NEW CURES

]]> By: Simplifying virus classification: The Baltimore system http://www.virology.ws/2009/08/07/how-viruses-are-classified/comment-page-1/#comment-16514 Simplifying virus classification: The Baltimore system Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:12:14 +0000 http://www.virology.ws/?p=1884#comment-16514 [...] many viruses are classified into individual families based on a variety of physical and biological criteria, they may also be [...] [...] many viruses are classified into individual families based on a variety of physical and biological criteria, they may also be [...]

]]> By: Jennifer Frazer http://www.virology.ws/2009/08/07/how-viruses-are-classified/comment-page-1/#comment-16191 Jennifer Frazer Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:29:24 +0000 http://www.virology.ws/?p=1884#comment-16191 Call me crazy, but I actually prefer some of the old names for viruses to the acronyms that have come into use today. Something about Rift Valley Fever or Ebola virus or Spanish Influenza sounds much better than SARS or HIV or even H1N1 virus, the PC term for swine flu. I wish there was some way to standardize viral names by site of first detection or discoverer rather than giving them an industrial, generic sounding acronym as a name.<br><br>Given that viruses probably evolved independently many times, I also think it makes sense not to go above the family level taxonomy-wise. It's too bad the plant and animal virus people can't get together on nomenclature and taxonomy, though. Call me crazy, but I actually prefer some of the old names for viruses to the acronyms that have come into use today. Something about Rift Valley Fever or Ebola virus or Spanish Influenza sounds much better than SARS or HIV or even H1N1 virus, the PC term for swine flu. I wish there was some way to standardize viral names by site of first detection or discoverer rather than giving them an industrial, generic sounding acronym as a name.

Given that viruses probably evolved independently many times, I also think it makes sense not to go above the family level taxonomy-wise. It's too bad the plant and animal virus people can't get together on nomenclature and taxonomy, though.

]]> By: rajkumarvats http://www.virology.ws/2009/08/07/how-viruses-are-classified/comment-page-1/#comment-15598 rajkumarvats Sat, 08 Aug 2009 04:31:53 +0000 http://www.virology.ws/?p=1884#comment-15598 The International Committee on the Taxonomy of Viruses database should be continuously updates as in future also we are going to see many new variants also.<br><br><a href="http://www.epernicus.com/people/rajkumarvats" rel="nofollow">http://www.epernicus.com/people/rajkumarvats</a> The International Committee on the Taxonomy of Viruses database should be continuously updates as in future also we are going to see many new variants also.

http://www.epernicus.com/people/rajkumarvats

]]> By: rajkumarvats http://www.virology.ws/2009/08/07/how-viruses-are-classified/comment-page-1/#comment-15596 rajkumarvats Sat, 08 Aug 2009 04:29:10 +0000 http://www.virology.ws/?p=1884#comment-15596 The International Committee on the Taxonomy of Viruses database should be continuously updates as in future also we are going to see many new variants also . The International Committee on the Taxonomy of Viruses database should be continuously updates as in future also we are going to see many new variants also .

]]> By: mdubuque http://www.virology.ws/2009/08/07/how-viruses-are-classified/comment-page-1/#comment-15595 mdubuque Sat, 08 Aug 2009 02:05:46 +0000 http://www.virology.ws/?p=1884#comment-15595 I'm assuming viruses have been around for billions of years. Perhaps I am mistaken, but it seems quite plausible to me.<br><br>In the plant world we say that horsetails and fungi are older because they preceded monocots and dicots. Similarly, the centipede and the turtle are older than homo sapiens.<br><br>Are some viruses therefore clearly more ancient than others? Are some viral genomes clearly more primitive than other more "advanced" viral genomes?<br><br>And sorry to go to far afield, but where the heck do prions fit into all this taxonomy? I know they aren't viruses, but is it possible they shared a joint ancestor with viruses? I just don't know how they fit into the big picture of life/non life. I'm assuming viruses have been around for billions of years. Perhaps I am mistaken, but it seems quite plausible to me.

In the plant world we say that horsetails and fungi are older because they preceded monocots and dicots. Similarly, the centipede and the turtle are older than homo sapiens.

Are some viruses therefore clearly more ancient than others? Are some viral genomes clearly more primitive than other more “advanced” viral genomes?

And sorry to go to far afield, but where the heck do prions fit into all this taxonomy? I know they aren't viruses, but is it possible they shared a joint ancestor with viruses? I just don't know how they fit into the big picture of life/non life.

]]>