<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Riding the influenza pandemic wave</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.virology.ws/2009/06/19/riding-the-influenza-pandemic-wave/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/06/19/riding-the-influenza-pandemic-wave/</link>
	<description>About viruses and viral disease</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The American Flu Charade &#124; Lew Rockwell</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/06/19/riding-the-influenza-pandemic-wave/comment-page-1/#comment-30165</link>
		<dc:creator>The American Flu Charade &#124; Lew Rockwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 21:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=1644#comment-30165</guid>
		<description>[...] For example, no one in the news media confronts the mistaken claim that the late-2009 season H1N1 flu has produced a &quot;pattern similar to that seen in the deadly 1918 flu pandemic.&quot; As virologist Vincent Racaniello PhD, Higgins Professor in the Department of Microbiology at Columbia University&#8217;s College of Physicians and Surgeons, says: &quot;There is no evidence that mutation led to the emergence of a u2018more virulent&#8217; virus that caused more severe disease in the fall of 1918. The only virus available to study was reconstructed from material obtained in November 1918. The first influenza virus was not isolated until 1933. The idea that a more virulent virus emerged in the fall has nevertheless become firmly established &#8212; without any scientific evidence to support the hypothesis.&quot; See here for more information. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For example, no one in the news media confronts the mistaken claim that the late-2009 season H1N1 flu has produced a &quot;pattern similar to that seen in the deadly 1918 flu pandemic.&quot; As virologist Vincent Racaniello PhD, Higgins Professor in the Department of Microbiology at Columbia University&#8217;s College of Physicians and Surgeons, says: &quot;There is no evidence that mutation led to the emergence of a u2018more virulent&#8217; virus that caused more severe disease in the fall of 1918. The only virus available to study was reconstructed from material obtained in November 1918. The first influenza virus was not isolated until 1933. The idea that a more virulent virus emerged in the fall has nevertheless become firmly established &mdash; without any scientific evidence to support the hypothesis.&quot; See here for more information. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: H1N1 pandemic is over</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/06/19/riding-the-influenza-pandemic-wave/comment-page-1/#comment-22939</link>
		<dc:creator>H1N1 pandemic is over</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 19:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=1644#comment-22939</guid>
		<description>[...] virus must change to a more lethal form. Although the four previous influenza pandemics occurred in multiple waves of increasing lethality, there is no evidence that they are a consequence of viral mutation. For example, the only virus [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] virus must change to a more lethal form. Although the four previous influenza pandemics occurred in multiple waves of increasing lethality, there is no evidence that they are a consequence of viral mutation. For example, the only virus [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beijing Hotels</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/06/19/riding-the-influenza-pandemic-wave/comment-page-1/#comment-19347</link>
		<dc:creator>Beijing Hotels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 23:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=1644#comment-19347</guid>
		<description>That Sounds interesting, I agree with you.Please keep at your good work, I would come back often.*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That Sounds interesting, I agree with you.Please keep at your good work, I would come back often.*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free of State &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The American Flu Charade News Media Maintains Undeserved Public Confidence In Flu Vaccination Program – Millions Of Doses Of Flu Vaccine May Go Unused This Season by Bill Sardi</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/06/19/riding-the-influenza-pandemic-wave/comment-page-1/#comment-17804</link>
		<dc:creator>Free of State &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The American Flu Charade News Media Maintains Undeserved Public Confidence In Flu Vaccination Program – Millions Of Doses Of Flu Vaccine May Go Unused This Season by Bill Sardi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=1644#comment-17804</guid>
		<description>[...] For example, no one in the news media confronts the mistaken claim that the late-2009 season H1N1 flu has produced a &#8220;pattern similar to that seen in the deadly 1918 flu pandemic.&#8221;  As virologist Vincent Racaniello PhD, Higgins Professor in the Department of Microbiology at Columbia University’s College of Physicians and Surgeons, says: &#8220;There is no evidence that mutation led to the emergence of a ‘more virulent’ virus that caused more severe disease in the fall of 1918. The only virus available to study was reconstructed from material obtained in November 1918. The first influenza virus was not isolated until 1933. The idea that a more virulent virus emerged in the fall has nevertheless become firmly established – without any scientific evidence to support the hypothesis.&#8221; See here for more information. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For example, no one in the news media confronts the mistaken claim that the late-2009 season H1N1 flu has produced a &#8220;pattern similar to that seen in the deadly 1918 flu pandemic.&#8221;  As virologist Vincent Racaniello PhD, Higgins Professor in the Department of Microbiology at Columbia University’s College of Physicians and Surgeons, says: &#8220;There is no evidence that mutation led to the emergence of a ‘more virulent’ virus that caused more severe disease in the fall of 1918. The only virus available to study was reconstructed from material obtained in November 1918. The first influenza virus was not isolated until 1933. The idea that a more virulent virus emerged in the fall has nevertheless become firmly established – without any scientific evidence to support the hypothesis.&#8221; See here for more information. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Law</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/06/19/riding-the-influenza-pandemic-wave/comment-page-1/#comment-17796</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Law</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 01:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=1644#comment-17796</guid>
		<description>3 months on and what&#039;s changed? Oh, yeah... and the Southern Hemisphere has survived.. in tact!! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;With about 11 % of the 25 million populace infected and around 200 deaths the countries of Australia and New Zealand reveal an infection fatality rate of around 1:25,000,... given that there have been about 4,500 deaths recorded globally so far that equates to about 105 million infections... The CDC has said 5-10 percent of communities in the USA where the virus has been were infected... that equates to about 15-30 Million USA citizens... This is not the monster we were lead to believe...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A good article that has withstood the test of time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3 months on and what&#39;s changed? Oh, yeah&#8230; and the Southern Hemisphere has survived.. in tact!! </p>
<p>With about 11 % of the 25 million populace infected and around 200 deaths the countries of Australia and New Zealand reveal an infection fatality rate of around 1:25,000,&#8230; given that there have been about 4,500 deaths recorded globally so far that equates to about 105 million infections&#8230; The CDC has said 5-10 percent of communities in the USA where the virus has been were infected&#8230; that equates to about 15-30 Million USA citizens&#8230; This is not the monster we were lead to believe&#8230;</p>
<p>A good article that has withstood the test of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The American Flu Charade &#124; Rights To Freedom</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/06/19/riding-the-influenza-pandemic-wave/comment-page-1/#comment-17784</link>
		<dc:creator>The American Flu Charade &#124; Rights To Freedom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 07:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=1644#comment-17784</guid>
		<description>[...] For example, no one in the news media confronts the mistaken claim that the late-2009 season H1N1 flu has produced a &#8220;pattern similar to that seen in the deadly 1918 flu pandemic.&#8221; As virologist Vincent Racaniello PhD, Higgins Professor in the Department of Microbiology at Columbia University’s College of Physicians and Surgeons, says: &#8220;There is no evidence that mutation led to the emergence of a ‘more virulent’ virus that caused more severe disease in the fall of 1918. The only virus available to study was reconstructed from material obtained in November 1918. The first influenza virus was not isolated until 1933. The idea that a more virulent virus emerged in the fall has nevertheless become firmly established – without any scientific evidence to support the hypothesis.&#8221; See here for more information. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For example, no one in the news media confronts the mistaken claim that the late-2009 season H1N1 flu has produced a &#8220;pattern similar to that seen in the deadly 1918 flu pandemic.&#8221; As virologist Vincent Racaniello PhD, Higgins Professor in the Department of Microbiology at Columbia University’s College of Physicians and Surgeons, says: &#8220;There is no evidence that mutation led to the emergence of a ‘more virulent’ virus that caused more severe disease in the fall of 1918. The only virus available to study was reconstructed from material obtained in November 1918. The first influenza virus was not isolated until 1933. The idea that a more virulent virus emerged in the fall has nevertheless become firmly established – without any scientific evidence to support the hypothesis.&#8221; See here for more information. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/06/19/riding-the-influenza-pandemic-wave/comment-page-1/#comment-17520</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 07:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=1644#comment-17520</guid>
		<description>The original sequence had both mutations. The current (revised) sequence has neither. It is 627E and 701D. The errors were attributed to passage effects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The original sequence had both mutations. The current (revised) sequence has neither. It is 627E and 701D. The errors were attributed to passage effects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yi_Na</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/06/19/riding-the-influenza-pandemic-wave/comment-page-1/#comment-17519</link>
		<dc:creator>Yi_Na</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 03:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=1644#comment-17519</guid>
		<description>Hi, &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; A/Shanghai/71T/2009 only have the E627K mutation but not the D701N as you mentioned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, </p>
<p> A/Shanghai/71T/2009 only have the E627K mutation but not the D701N as you mentioned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: profvrr</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/06/19/riding-the-influenza-pandemic-wave/comment-page-1/#comment-16748</link>
		<dc:creator>profvrr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 13:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=1644#comment-16748</guid>
		<description>I suggest you read the recent JAMA article by Taubenberger:&lt;br&gt;&quot;Understand Influenza Backward&quot;&lt;br&gt;(&lt;a href=&quot;http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/302/6/679&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/302/6...&lt;/a&gt;). Here is an&lt;br&gt;excerpt:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Spring circulation of the novel virus in the Northern Hemisphere at&lt;br&gt;the end of the 2008-2009 influenza season inevitably has led to&lt;br&gt;comparisons with events in 1918-1919, which in some settings were&lt;br&gt;preceded and followed by outbreaks of respiratory illnesses. Some also&lt;br&gt;believe that the 1918 pandemic began with a premonitory &quot;herald wave,&quot;&lt;br&gt;a term related to an old hypothesis, which influenza and dengue fever&lt;br&gt;appeared to have supported, that as new viruses begin to circulate in&lt;br&gt;human populations they inevitably acquire mutations that increase&lt;br&gt;transmissibility and virulence.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Evidence for unusual influenza activity in the years before 1918 is&lt;br&gt;inconclusive. Occasional outbreaks of severe and fatal bacterial&lt;br&gt;pneumonia possibly related to influenza or other respiratory viruses,&lt;br&gt;detected in the European war theater in 1916-1918, are difficult to&lt;br&gt;interpret in the absence of pathological or other diagnostic material.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In spring 1918 there were widespread but distinct outbreaks and&lt;br&gt;epidemics of probable influenza in many different parts of Europe,&lt;br&gt;most featuring low to negligible mortality and a scattershot pattern&lt;br&gt;that differed from the undoubted epidemic waves seen later in the&lt;br&gt;year. Outbreaks of mostly nonfatal acute respiratory diseases were&lt;br&gt;also described in the United States in late 1917 and early 1918,&lt;br&gt;especially in military camps but also in cities. Whether the same or&lt;br&gt;different viruses caused any of these outbreaks is speculative. The&lt;br&gt;first documented wave of 1918 often confusingly referred to as the&lt;br&gt;spring wave, was actually a summer surge of influenza fatalities&lt;br&gt;concentrated in some but not all northern European countries between&lt;br&gt;late June and August 1918. Despite enormous wartime traffic, it is&lt;br&gt;curious that many English cities had a summer wave but France did&lt;br&gt;not.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the absence of genetic differences among virus isolates, the cause&lt;br&gt;of increased virulence is unknown.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suggest you read the recent JAMA article by Taubenberger:<br />&#8220;Understand Influenza Backward&#8221;<br />(<a href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/302/6/679" rel="nofollow">http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/302/6&#8230;</a>). Here is an<br />excerpt:</p>
<p>&#8220;Spring circulation of the novel virus in the Northern Hemisphere at<br />the end of the 2008-2009 influenza season inevitably has led to<br />comparisons with events in 1918-1919, which in some settings were<br />preceded and followed by outbreaks of respiratory illnesses. Some also<br />believe that the 1918 pandemic began with a premonitory &#8220;herald wave,&#8221;<br />a term related to an old hypothesis, which influenza and dengue fever<br />appeared to have supported, that as new viruses begin to circulate in<br />human populations they inevitably acquire mutations that increase<br />transmissibility and virulence.</p>
<p>Evidence for unusual influenza activity in the years before 1918 is<br />inconclusive. Occasional outbreaks of severe and fatal bacterial<br />pneumonia possibly related to influenza or other respiratory viruses,<br />detected in the European war theater in 1916-1918, are difficult to<br />interpret in the absence of pathological or other diagnostic material.</p>
<p>In spring 1918 there were widespread but distinct outbreaks and<br />epidemics of probable influenza in many different parts of Europe,<br />most featuring low to negligible mortality and a scattershot pattern<br />that differed from the undoubted epidemic waves seen later in the<br />year. Outbreaks of mostly nonfatal acute respiratory diseases were<br />also described in the United States in late 1917 and early 1918,<br />especially in military camps but also in cities. Whether the same or<br />different viruses caused any of these outbreaks is speculative. The<br />first documented wave of 1918 often confusingly referred to as the<br />spring wave, was actually a summer surge of influenza fatalities<br />concentrated in some but not all northern European countries between<br />late June and August 1918. Despite enormous wartime traffic, it is<br />curious that many English cities had a summer wave but France did<br />not.&#8221;</p>
<p>In the absence of genetic differences among virus isolates, the cause<br />of increased virulence is unknown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guenter stertenbrink</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/06/19/riding-the-influenza-pandemic-wave/comment-page-1/#comment-16742</link>
		<dc:creator>guenter stertenbrink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 13:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=1644#comment-16742</guid>
		<description>We do have several samples from 1918,Alaska,New York,South Carolina.&lt;br&gt;They are almost identical.&lt;br&gt;It was globally more virulent in the 2nd wave. This isn&#039;t explained by the alternatives.&lt;br&gt;We can also track how the more virulent strain spreads e.g. on the ships,&lt;br&gt;and it&#039;s not just the same virus as in wave 1, because it would have started&lt;br&gt;everywhere simultaneously then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We do have several samples from 1918,Alaska,New York,South Carolina.<br />They are almost identical.<br />It was globally more virulent in the 2nd wave. This isn&#39;t explained by the alternatives.<br />We can also track how the more virulent strain spreads e.g. on the ships,<br />and it&#39;s not just the same virus as in wave 1, because it would have started<br />everywhere simultaneously then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/06/19/riding-the-influenza-pandemic-wave/comment-page-1/#comment-1886</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 12:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=1644#comment-1886</guid>
		<description>Hi there,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for for using my photo in this post!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If possible please attribute it to Duncan Rawlinson and link to me @ &lt;a href=&quot;http://TheLastMinuteBlog.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;TheLastMinuteBlog.com&lt;/a&gt; as per my request here:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://flickr.com/people/thelastminute/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://flickr.com/people/thelastminute/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Take care!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there,</p>
<p>Thanks for for using my photo in this post!</p>
<p>If possible please attribute it to Duncan Rawlinson and link to me @ <a href="http://TheLastMinuteBlog.com" rel="nofollow">TheLastMinuteBlog.com</a> as per my request here:<br /><a href="http://flickr.com/people/thelastminute/" rel="nofollow">http://flickr.com/people/thelastminute/</a></p>
<p>Take care!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake the Peg</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/06/19/riding-the-influenza-pandemic-wave/comment-page-1/#comment-1865</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake the Peg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=1644#comment-1865</guid>
		<description>Hello,&lt;br&gt;It would be good to hear your thoughts on A/Shanghai/71T/2009 that has just appeared with both the PB2 E627K and D701N mutations. It took 43 days to adapt! D701N is thought to allow E627 viruses to become infectious to humans and perhaps has led to the E627K arising. Both are quite scary individually and together I think they look very worrying - transmissibility should be increased due to more efficient replication in the cooler temperatures of the respiratory tract.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(I posted this elsewhere on your site - sorry for the duplication but I just read this section on this exact matter).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,<br />It would be good to hear your thoughts on A/Shanghai/71T/2009 that has just appeared with both the PB2 E627K and D701N mutations. It took 43 days to adapt! D701N is thought to allow E627 viruses to become infectious to humans and perhaps has led to the E627K arising. Both are quite scary individually and together I think they look very worrying &#8211; transmissibility should be increased due to more efficient replication in the cooler temperatures of the respiratory tract.</p>
<p>(I posted this elsewhere on your site &#8211; sorry for the duplication but I just read this section on this exact matter).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: profvrr</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/06/19/riding-the-influenza-pandemic-wave/comment-page-1/#comment-1569</link>
		<dc:creator>profvrr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=1644#comment-1569</guid>
		<description>Correct, the complications of influenza may occur even with less&lt;br&gt;virulent strains, such as the 2009 H1N1. A more virulent strain would&lt;br&gt;likely be an increase in the number of infections leading to&lt;br&gt;complications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correct, the complications of influenza may occur even with less<br />virulent strains, such as the 2009 H1N1. A more virulent strain would<br />likely be an increase in the number of infections leading to<br />complications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: profvrr</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/06/19/riding-the-influenza-pandemic-wave/comment-page-1/#comment-1568</link>
		<dc:creator>profvrr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=1644#comment-1568</guid>
		<description>If you take Tamiflu when you feel ill, the virus has already&lt;br&gt;multiplied extensively - therefore you will produce an immune response&lt;br&gt;against the virus, and immunologic memory will occur. Therefore&lt;br&gt;Tamiflu will not &#039;stunt&#039; the immune response against influenza.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you take Tamiflu when you feel ill, the virus has already<br />multiplied extensively &#8211; therefore you will produce an immune response<br />against the virus, and immunologic memory will occur. Therefore<br />Tamiflu will not &#39;stunt&#39; the immune response against influenza.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phytosleuth</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/06/19/riding-the-influenza-pandemic-wave/comment-page-1/#comment-1557</link>
		<dc:creator>phytosleuth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 17:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=1644#comment-1557</guid>
		<description>So if I&#039;ve got this right, the result of severe, virulent influenza (no matter what strain) may involve one or more of these four pathologies: &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cytokine storm: where the immune system ravages one&#039;s own tissues in the lungs or other organs; an over-response or dysregulation of the immune system&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Secondary bacterial infection: usually Strep or Staph or Hemophilus (but there are many more) that takes advantage of the primary influenza viral infection which also infects the respiratory tissues; MRSA being among the most dangerous bacterial infections&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Viral pneumonia: influenza virus infects the cells of the lower respiratory tract; a possibly similar mechanism in human cases of H5N1 bird flu&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ventilator-associated pneumonia: hospital-acquired, bacterial infection of the lung caused by ventilator treatment (most often Pseudomonas)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;These conditions may occur whether or not the strain is considered virulent? Yes? &lt;br&gt;My point being, just because someone develops ventilator-associated pneumonia or the other three conditions, it doesn&#039;t mean the flu strain is virulent. Yes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So if I&#39;ve got this right, the result of severe, virulent influenza (no matter what strain) may involve one or more of these four pathologies: </p>
<p>Cytokine storm: where the immune system ravages one&#39;s own tissues in the lungs or other organs; an over-response or dysregulation of the immune system</p>
<p>Secondary bacterial infection: usually Strep or Staph or Hemophilus (but there are many more) that takes advantage of the primary influenza viral infection which also infects the respiratory tissues; MRSA being among the most dangerous bacterial infections</p>
<p>Viral pneumonia: influenza virus infects the cells of the lower respiratory tract; a possibly similar mechanism in human cases of H5N1 bird flu</p>
<p>Ventilator-associated pneumonia: hospital-acquired, bacterial infection of the lung caused by ventilator treatment (most often Pseudomonas)</p>
<p>These conditions may occur whether or not the strain is considered virulent? Yes? <br />My point being, just because someone develops ventilator-associated pneumonia or the other three conditions, it doesn&#39;t mean the flu strain is virulent. Yes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/06/19/riding-the-influenza-pandemic-wave/comment-page-1/#comment-1556</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 14:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=1644#comment-1556</guid>
		<description>Hi there,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for for using my photo in this post!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If possible please attribute it to Duncan Rawlinson and link to me @ &lt;a href=&quot;http://TheLastMinuteBlog.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://TheLastMinuteBlog.com&lt;/a&gt; as per my request here:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://flickr.com/people/thelastminute&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://flickr.com/people/thelastminute&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Take care!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there,</p>
<p>Thanks for for using my photo in this post!</p>
<p>If possible please attribute it to Duncan Rawlinson and link to me @ <a href="http://TheLastMinuteBlog.com" rel="nofollow">http://TheLastMinuteBlog.com</a> as per my request here:<br /><a href="http://flickr.com/people/thelastminute" rel="nofollow">http://flickr.com/people/thelastminute</a></p>
<p>Take care!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Riding the influenza pandemic wave &#124; swine flu pandemic</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/06/19/riding-the-influenza-pandemic-wave/comment-page-1/#comment-1554</link>
		<dc:creator>Riding the influenza pandemic wave &#124; swine flu pandemic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 02:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=1644#comment-1554</guid>
		<description>[...] the original:  Riding the influenza pandemic wave   Bookmark It                    Hide Sites    $$(&#039;div.d1328&#039;).each( function(e) { [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the original:  Riding the influenza pandemic wave   Bookmark It                    Hide Sites    $$(&#39;div.d1328&#39;).each( function(e) { [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/06/19/riding-the-influenza-pandemic-wave/comment-page-1/#comment-1551</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 19:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=1644#comment-1551</guid>
		<description>Vincent, I have a question for you dealing with the immune response and Tamiflu.  I understand that if you get the infection - it runs its course - and you recover, that you gain the antigen (learned) response that should help with similar influenza viruses in the future.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now what if you start to get sick and take Tamiflu - will this &quot;stunt&quot; your  learned immune response and you will not produce enough antigens to help with future similar influenza infections (say, a similar fall wave of H1N1).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Many thanks,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vincent, I have a question for you dealing with the immune response and Tamiflu.  I understand that if you get the infection &#8211; it runs its course &#8211; and you recover, that you gain the antigen (learned) response that should help with similar influenza viruses in the future.</p>
<p>Now what if you start to get sick and take Tamiflu &#8211; will this &#8220;stunt&#8221; your  learned immune response and you will not produce enough antigens to help with future similar influenza infections (say, a similar fall wave of H1N1).</p>
<p>Many thanks,</p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ElDean</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/06/19/riding-the-influenza-pandemic-wave/comment-page-1/#comment-1549</link>
		<dc:creator>ElDean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 18:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=1644#comment-1549</guid>
		<description>I think speculation about the future of this new strain is useless, I think we just survey, and wait and see</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think speculation about the future of this new strain is useless, I think we just survey, and wait and see</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

