<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Influenza virus attachment to cells</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.virology.ws/2009/05/04/influenza-virus-attachment-to-cells/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/05/04/influenza-virus-attachment-to-cells/</link>
	<description>About viruses and viral disease</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dnhamil</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/05/04/influenza-virus-attachment-to-cells/comment-page-1/#comment-30849</link>
		<dc:creator>Dnhamil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 05:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=1308#comment-30849</guid>
		<description>Are the receptors on the host cell always present and it just so happens that viral proteins can bind to them in a complimentary fashion? Viruses are parasitic so why do host cells have receptors for them to attach to?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are the receptors on the host cell always present and it just so happens that viral proteins can bind to them in a complimentary fashion? Viruses are parasitic so why do host cells have receptors for them to attach to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eka N Nawangsih</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/05/04/influenza-virus-attachment-to-cells/comment-page-1/#comment-30417</link>
		<dc:creator>Eka N Nawangsih</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 04:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=1308#comment-30417</guid>
		<description>Prof, i like your illustration about attachment of the virion to cells. it help me to understand how influenza viruses bound to proteins</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prof, i like your illustration about attachment of the virion to cells. it help me to understand how influenza viruses bound to proteins</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: khairunnisa</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/05/04/influenza-virus-attachment-to-cells/comment-page-1/#comment-29738</link>
		<dc:creator>khairunnisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 05:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=1308#comment-29738</guid>
		<description>Hello Prof. actually I love your blog very much. It helps me in understands better about the fascinating world of virology. I&#039;m still an undergraduate student from Malaysia. Thanks prof. keep it up! ^^, </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Prof. actually I love your blog very much. It helps me in understands better about the fascinating world of virology. I&#8217;m still an undergraduate student from Malaysia. Thanks prof. keep it up! ^^,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: profvrr</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/05/04/influenza-virus-attachment-to-cells/comment-page-1/#comment-29194</link>
		<dc:creator>profvrr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 11:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=1308#comment-29194</guid>
		<description>The sialic acids bound by influenza viruses are attached to proteins. The identity of the protein does not seem to matter for influenza virus entry. Hence sialic acid is the receptor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sialic acids bound by influenza viruses are attached to proteins. The identity of the protein does not seem to matter for influenza virus entry. Hence sialic acid is the receptor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milind</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/05/04/influenza-virus-attachment-to-cells/comment-page-1/#comment-29192</link>
		<dc:creator>Milind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 11:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=1308#comment-29192</guid>
		<description>there are reports that sialic acid is just a docking site not the receptor .why is it that we could not find  influenza virus receptor till date?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there are reports that sialic acid is just a docking site not the receptor .why is it that we could not find  influenza virus receptor till date?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ghildiyal_sneha</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/05/04/influenza-virus-attachment-to-cells/comment-page-1/#comment-28778</link>
		<dc:creator>Ghildiyal_sneha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 02:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=1308#comment-28778</guid>
		<description>is sialic acid inhibitor of influenza virus
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is sialic acid inhibitor of influenza virus<br />
 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: profvrr</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/05/04/influenza-virus-attachment-to-cells/comment-page-1/#comment-22938</link>
		<dc:creator>profvrr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 22:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=1308#comment-22938</guid>
		<description>Possibly, although the presence of NA protein should remove sialic&lt;br&gt;acids from host proteins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Possibly, although the presence of NA protein should remove sialic<br />acids from host proteins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/05/04/influenza-virus-attachment-to-cells/comment-page-1/#comment-22921</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 15:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=1308#comment-22921</guid>
		<description>Is it possible the newly formed HA bind to host proteins having sialic acid in Trans-Golgi network?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it possible the newly formed HA bind to host proteins having sialic acid in Trans-Golgi network?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: profvrr</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/05/04/influenza-virus-attachment-to-cells/comment-page-1/#comment-22900</link>
		<dc:creator>profvrr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 22:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=1308#comment-22900</guid>
		<description>Thanks for picking that up - you are correct, the colors of the&lt;br&gt;spheres should be swapped. I have fixed the image.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for picking that up &#8211; you are correct, the colors of the<br />spheres should be swapped. I have fixed the image.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ha-tag</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/05/04/influenza-virus-attachment-to-cells/comment-page-1/#comment-22899</link>
		<dc:creator>Ha-tag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 21:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=1308#comment-22899</guid>
		<description>The spheres in the picture should have opposite colors, the last sphere, the sialic acid should be orange, corresponding the color of the chair in the structures on the right.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;is that right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The spheres in the picture should have opposite colors, the last sphere, the sialic acid should be orange, corresponding the color of the chair in the structures on the right.</p>
<p>is that right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Headless HA: Universal influenza vaccine?</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/05/04/influenza-virus-attachment-to-cells/comment-page-1/#comment-22090</link>
		<dc:creator>Headless HA: Universal influenza vaccine?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 20:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=1308#comment-22090</guid>
		<description>[...] virus infection are directed against the globular head of the HA, the protein essential for attachment to and entry into cells. Unfortunately, the HA head undergoes significant antigenic variation. The HA stalk is more [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] virus infection are directed against the globular head of the HA, the protein essential for attachment to and entry into cells. Unfortunately, the HA head undergoes significant antigenic variation. The HA stalk is more [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: profvrr</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/05/04/influenza-virus-attachment-to-cells/comment-page-1/#comment-21540</link>
		<dc:creator>profvrr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 02:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=1308#comment-21540</guid>
		<description>The NA protein is inserted into the plasma membrane before the virion&lt;br&gt;buds from the surface. Its presence may lead to removal of sialic&lt;br&gt;acids, which would prevent re-binding of the newly synthesized&lt;br&gt;particle. In theory at least; there are no data that directly answer&lt;br&gt;your question. The results in the paper you cite are consistent with&lt;br&gt;the idea that NA has some inhibitory effect during infection as would&lt;br&gt;be expected. Clearly there are significant differences between&lt;br&gt;infection and budding that are not fully understood.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NA protein is inserted into the plasma membrane before the virion<br />buds from the surface. Its presence may lead to removal of sialic<br />acids, which would prevent re-binding of the newly synthesized<br />particle. In theory at least; there are no data that directly answer<br />your question. The results in the paper you cite are consistent with<br />the idea that NA has some inhibitory effect during infection as would<br />be expected. Clearly there are significant differences between<br />infection and budding that are not fully understood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJackson</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/05/04/influenza-virus-attachment-to-cells/comment-page-1/#comment-21539</link>
		<dc:creator>JJackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 02:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=1308#comment-21539</guid>
		<description>Thanks but that then begs the question why when a new virion is budded does it not immediately bind and restart the fusion process before the NAs cut it free. On both occasions you have a virion adjacent to cell what is the difference why is there a net benefit to having NA cleaving sialic resisdues? There obviously is one or neuraminidase inhibitors would not work. I saw this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19879239&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19879239&lt;/a&gt; and assumed it was due to nuraminidase having an inhibitory effect on cell infection although that effect was significantly outweighed by the benefits when budding</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks but that then begs the question why when a new virion is budded does it not immediately bind and restart the fusion process before the NAs cut it free. On both occasions you have a virion adjacent to cell what is the difference why is there a net benefit to having NA cleaving sialic resisdues? There obviously is one or neuraminidase inhibitors would not work. I saw this <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19879239" rel="nofollow">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19879239</a> and assumed it was due to nuraminidase having an inhibitory effect on cell infection although that effect was significantly outweighed by the benefits when budding</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: profvrr</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/05/04/influenza-virus-attachment-to-cells/comment-page-1/#comment-21538</link>
		<dc:creator>profvrr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 02:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=1308#comment-21538</guid>
		<description>Always an interesting question. The idea is that during entry, the HA&lt;br&gt;binds and the particle enters before the slower-acting NA can remove&lt;br&gt;the sialic acid. This idea has some support from the HA assay;&lt;br&gt;initially virions bind red blood cells but after approximately 30&lt;br&gt;minutes the NA cleaves off sialic acid and reverses the HA. See&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.virology.ws/2009/05/27/influenza-hemagglutination-inhibition-assay/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.virology.ws/2009/05/27/influenza-hem...&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Always an interesting question. The idea is that during entry, the HA<br />binds and the particle enters before the slower-acting NA can remove<br />the sialic acid. This idea has some support from the HA assay;<br />initially virions bind red blood cells but after approximately 30<br />minutes the NA cleaves off sialic acid and reverses the HA. See<br /><a href="http://www.virology.ws/2009/05/27/influenza-hemagglutination-inhibition-assay/" rel="nofollow">http://www.virology.ws/2009/05/27/influenza-hem&#8230;</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: profvrr</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/05/04/influenza-virus-attachment-to-cells/comment-page-1/#comment-19302</link>
		<dc:creator>profvrr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 18:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=1308#comment-19302</guid>
		<description>The NA protein is inserted into the plasma membrane before the virion&lt;br&gt;buds from the surface. Its presence may lead to removal of sialic&lt;br&gt;acids, which would prevent re-binding of the newly synthesized&lt;br&gt;particle. In theory at least; there are no data that directly answer&lt;br&gt;your question. The results in the paper you cite are consistent with&lt;br&gt;the idea that NA has some inhibitory effect during infection as would&lt;br&gt;be expected. Clearly there are significant differences between&lt;br&gt;infection and budding that are not fully understood.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NA protein is inserted into the plasma membrane before the virion<br />buds from the surface. Its presence may lead to removal of sialic<br />acids, which would prevent re-binding of the newly synthesized<br />particle. In theory at least; there are no data that directly answer<br />your question. The results in the paper you cite are consistent with<br />the idea that NA has some inhibitory effect during infection as would<br />be expected. Clearly there are significant differences between<br />infection and budding that are not fully understood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJackson</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/05/04/influenza-virus-attachment-to-cells/comment-page-1/#comment-19296</link>
		<dc:creator>JJackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 18:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=1308#comment-19296</guid>
		<description>Thanks but that then begs the question why when a new virion is budded does it not immediately bind and restart the fusion process before the NAs cut it free. On both occasions you have a virion adjacent to cell what is the difference why is there a net benefit to having NA cleaving sialic resisdues? There obviously is one or neuraminidase inhibitors would not work. I saw this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19879239&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19879239&lt;/a&gt; and assumed it was due to nuraminidase having an inhibitory effect on cell infection although that effect was significantly outweighed by the benefits when budding</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks but that then begs the question why when a new virion is budded does it not immediately bind and restart the fusion process before the NAs cut it free. On both occasions you have a virion adjacent to cell what is the difference why is there a net benefit to having NA cleaving sialic resisdues? There obviously is one or neuraminidase inhibitors would not work. I saw this <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19879239" rel="nofollow">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19879239</a> and assumed it was due to nuraminidase having an inhibitory effect on cell infection although that effect was significantly outweighed by the benefits when budding</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: profvrr</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/05/04/influenza-virus-attachment-to-cells/comment-page-1/#comment-19293</link>
		<dc:creator>profvrr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 18:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=1308#comment-19293</guid>
		<description>Always an interesting question. The idea is that during entry, the HA&lt;br&gt;binds and the particle enters before the slower-acting NA can remove&lt;br&gt;the sialic acid. This idea has some support from the HA assay;&lt;br&gt;initially virions bind red blood cells but after approximately 30&lt;br&gt;minutes the NA cleaves off sialic acid and reverses the HA. See&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.virology.ws/2009/05/27/influenza-hemagglutination-inhibition-assay/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.virology.ws/2009/05/27/influenza-hem...&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Always an interesting question. The idea is that during entry, the HA<br />binds and the particle enters before the slower-acting NA can remove<br />the sialic acid. This idea has some support from the HA assay;<br />initially virions bind red blood cells but after approximately 30<br />minutes the NA cleaves off sialic acid and reverses the HA. See<br /><a href="http://www.virology.ws/2009/05/27/influenza-hemagglutination-inhibition-assay/" rel="nofollow">http://www.virology.ws/2009/05/27/influenza-hem&#8230;</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJackson</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/05/04/influenza-virus-attachment-to-cells/comment-page-1/#comment-19274</link>
		<dc:creator>JJackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 16:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=1308#comment-19274</guid>
		<description>If I understand correctly the Neuraminidase prunes sialic acid residues from glycoproteins. This is useful in allowing a clean get away after budding and also to stop binding of virions to each other. How does the virus prevent its NAs from removing the residues it needs to bind onto the glycocaylx before fusion? Wouldn’t its NAs be freeing it as fast as it could bind?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I understand correctly the Neuraminidase prunes sialic acid residues from glycoproteins. This is useful in allowing a clean get away after budding and also to stop binding of virions to each other. How does the virus prevent its NAs from removing the residues it needs to bind onto the glycocaylx before fusion? Wouldn’t its NAs be freeing it as fast as it could bind?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Influenza HA cleavage is required for infectivity</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/05/04/influenza-virus-attachment-to-cells/comment-page-1/#comment-1565</link>
		<dc:creator>Influenza HA cleavage is required for infectivity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 01:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=1308#comment-1565</guid>
		<description>[...] influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA) is the viral protein that attaches to cell receptors. The HA also plays an important role in the release of the viral RNA into the cell, by causing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA) is the viral protein that attaches to cell receptors. The HA also plays an important role in the release of the viral RNA into the cell, by causing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Souptopia</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/05/04/influenza-virus-attachment-to-cells/comment-page-1/#comment-1340</link>
		<dc:creator>Souptopia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 20:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=1308#comment-1340</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Influenza virus attachment to cells...&lt;/strong&gt;

Influenza virus attachment to cells...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Influenza virus attachment to cells&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Influenza virus attachment to cells&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Release of influenza viral RNAs into cells</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/05/04/influenza-virus-attachment-to-cells/comment-page-1/#comment-955</link>
		<dc:creator>Release of influenza viral RNAs into cells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 22:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=1308#comment-955</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;Influenza virus attachment to cells&#8221; we left the intact virion on the cell surface. The next step is that the viral genetic information [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;Influenza virus attachment to cells&#8221; we left the intact virion on the cell surface. The next step is that the viral genetic information [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: duck</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/05/04/influenza-virus-attachment-to-cells/comment-page-1/#comment-929</link>
		<dc:creator>duck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 00:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=1308#comment-929</guid>
		<description>Thanks very much for the reply, and for the whole blog - this is fascinating!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks very much for the reply, and for the whole blog &#8211; this is fascinating!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: profvrr</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/05/04/influenza-virus-attachment-to-cells/comment-page-1/#comment-895</link>
		<dc:creator>profvrr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 00:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=1308#comment-895</guid>
		<description>Yes, some were developed years ago, but did not inhibit all HAs and&lt;br&gt;were never brought to market. However, sialic acid analogs have been&lt;br&gt;developed which inhibit the viral NA - these are the well known&lt;br&gt;antivirals oseltamivir and zanamivir. Sialic acid is the ligand for&lt;br&gt;the viral NA enzyme. I have an upcoming post on this topic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, some were developed years ago, but did not inhibit all HAs and<br />were never brought to market. However, sialic acid analogs have been<br />developed which inhibit the viral NA &#8211; these are the well known<br />antivirals oseltamivir and zanamivir. Sialic acid is the ligand for<br />the viral NA enzyme. I have an upcoming post on this topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey Philipp</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/05/04/influenza-virus-attachment-to-cells/comment-page-1/#comment-894</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey Philipp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 00:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=1308#comment-894</guid>
		<description>Has there been any success to developing compounds that can out compete the HA ligand?  Something that would bind stronger to sialic acid.  I could see this as an attractive target for intervention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has there been any success to developing compounds that can out compete the HA ligand?  Something that would bind stronger to sialic acid.  I could see this as an attractive target for intervention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: profvrr</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/05/04/influenza-virus-attachment-to-cells/comment-page-1/#comment-885</link>
		<dc:creator>profvrr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 20:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=1308#comment-885</guid>
		<description>Sialic acids are in every cell and have many functions. A few&lt;br&gt;examples: Sialic acid-rich oligosaccharides on the glycoconjugates&lt;br&gt;found on surface membranes help keep water at the surface of cells.&lt;br&gt;Since water is a polar molecule with partial positive charges on both&lt;br&gt;hydrogen atoms, it is attracted to cell surfaces and membranes. This&lt;br&gt;also contributes to cellular fluid uptake. Sialic acid in the form of&lt;br&gt;polysialic acid is an unusual posttranslational modification that&lt;br&gt;occurs on the neural cell adhesion molecules, NCAM. In the synapse,&lt;br&gt;the strong negative charge of the polysialic acid prevents NCAM&lt;br&gt;cross-linking of cells.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sialic acids are in every cell and have many functions. A few<br />examples: Sialic acid-rich oligosaccharides on the glycoconjugates<br />found on surface membranes help keep water at the surface of cells.<br />Since water is a polar molecule with partial positive charges on both<br />hydrogen atoms, it is attracted to cell surfaces and membranes. This<br />also contributes to cellular fluid uptake. Sialic acid in the form of<br />polysialic acid is an unusual posttranslational modification that<br />occurs on the neural cell adhesion molecules, NCAM. In the synapse,<br />the strong negative charge of the polysialic acid prevents NCAM<br />cross-linking of cells.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: duck</title>
		<link>http://www.virology.ws/2009/05/04/influenza-virus-attachment-to-cells/comment-page-1/#comment-883</link>
		<dc:creator>duck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 20:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virology.ws/?p=1308#comment-883</guid>
		<description>So what is the function of sialic acid (apart from allowing virus infection) - is it useful to us, or just an accident? Why is it there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what is the function of sialic acid (apart from allowing virus infection) &#8211; is it useful to us, or just an accident? Why is it there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

